The Democratic Socialist Paradigm of Kathie Glass

It is no secret that I am a Gandhian in the sense that I worship God as Truth Only, and I have no real problem with collectivism in a stateless environment, as is shown in the libertarian socialism of Gandhiji, my Internet co-hort Noam Chomsky, etc.  I am not a libertarian socialist, which, in my studies, requires a stateless society in order to exist, by the way.  I am a Tolstoyan ("swear not"--give no allegiance to Caesar/ government by oath or affirmation), Gandhian (One who worships God as Truth Only), Rothbardian (Mises.org/ anarco-capitalist, Ron Paul) Libertarian (You do it your way, I'll do it mine).

The demarkation line that concerns me is that any attempt at libertarian socialism within the state conception of life (for a local public school, for example) becomes democratic socialism (Mandela. King), and this represents the violence of the state, if utilized at any level.  There is no ultimate local control under the state conception of life, and I see no evidence of Kathie Glass endorsing a stateless society.

Therefore, I am forced to conclude she is operating under the false hope of developing a libertarian socialist paradigm in her free public school proposal, while in reality endorsing the violence of democratic socialism.  Remember, Marxism is insidious.  If you let it in the door, it will grow until it chokes out everything in the greenhouse.  Government indoctrination day camps for children (10th Plank of "The Communist Manifesto") is not benign.

Gene Chapman, CEO
Libertarian Global Library and Book Exchange
gkchapman2012@Hotmail.com

Is Kathie Glass Being Honest with the LP or StoptheMagnet.com?

Dear Stopthemagnet.com:

Texas Gubernatorial Candidate Kathie Glass is facing quite an onslaught of Libertarian opposition to her answers to your questionnaire.  She claims with us, for example, that she does not and has never supported e-verify.  Can you tell us if she has made any effort to correct this apparent error on your website?

Most respectfully,



Gene Chapman


Governor of Texas
Name: Glass, Kathie
Phone: (512) 308 6936
Email:
Website: http://www.kathieglass.org
Original Survey Response Document
Survey Responses:
AGREE - A) Use DPS or Texas State Guard to assist in protecting the border and providing resources to Sheriffs along the border.
AGREE - B) Support state legislative efforts or local ballot initiatives to repeal all sanctuary/safety zones in the State of Texas.
AGREE - C) Companies should be at risk of losing business licenses for failing to properly identify lawful employees using E-Verify or similar resource.
AGREE - D) Need to implement the re-introduction of the teaching of the trades in our public schools.
AGREE - E) Require use of E-Verify or similar resource as a condition for a contract with a state or local governmental entity.
AGREE - F) Use 10th Amendment powers to limit the use of executive orders by the President to fully align with the U.S. Constitution.

Kathie Glass: "Ants"

I suppose if I were from Georgia, where I understand Kathie Glass is from, racism against latinos would be a norm, so her use of the term,"ants," to describe latinos crossing the border between Texas and Mexico is at least understood, while not appreciated in a politician. 

The problem from my end is that I was born here in Texas in 1966.  The men who built fence on my father's farm were Mexican and taught my father Spanish, the Spanish I used to hear my father sing along too on the car radio when I was a little boy.  My sister has a mother who is an "ant," by Kathie Glass standards.  A house full of "ants" are sleeping about 20 yards from me right now, as I write this:  my neighbors.  Down the street are more houses full of "ants."  I call them my friends.  I got my hair cut by an "ant" today next door to the local latino shopping center where I like to buy my food.

In early 2001, I moved to El Paso to see if I could make a go of it on 20 acres of sand I bought a few years before.  The job I got was as a marketing manager for an alfalfa and pecan farm on the Rio Grande River.  It was like a old Western novel to live those months there.  You could throw a rock from the edge of the farm and hit a bus stop on the Mexican side of the river.  The men who worked along side me were very hurt at the least white reference to their presumed inferiority, so I learned to be very careful not to offend, as it has never been my nature to do such a thing to anyone on racial lines.  I learned to eat the melon under the giant cottonwood trees there on the river when they offered in order to show that I was not too good to eat with them.  After months, I was eating in their homes, on occasion.  And they live a good life there, let me tell you.

What we need in Texas is not more Kathie Glass politicians from Georgia telling us who our family members should be or when a river should be crossed.  People down on the Mexican border have been crossing that river for 500 years with no problem.  That presumed problem is a government created problem.  Hell, the people we pissed of in the Middle East don't even come at us through Mexico anyway;  they come through their established communities in Detroit and Ontario, up North.  And if we would give them a fair shake, we wouldn't even have them pissed at us.

Kathie Glass has a long way to go to be ready to lead anything in Texas, especially a political party that gains for some odd reason the power to push people around and even kill them in the name of the state. Have you ever heard of something so ridiculous as a racist libertarian?

Gene Chapman. CEO
Libertarian Global Library and Book Exchange
gkchapman2012@hotmail.com

Kevin Pick Why not quote Kathie Glass in your article? Here is what she said:

“That’s not the way for Texas," she said. "We should secure our border at the border. The Arizona-style interrogation, after people have become integrated in the community, is like my ants in my pantry, and I want to remove them one at a time and take them outside.”

I don't find that racist but I do find your article disingenuous. Could you please at least quote her, in the name of honesty and integrity?

13 hours ago · Like

Gene Chapman Jeff, can you comment on this?

10 hours ago · Like

Gene Chapman Jeff is looking at it. I'm still not impressed with her border securement, her use of insects to describe Mexicans or . . . .

10 hours ago · Like

Jeff Daiell The quotation is from The Texas Tribune. Ms. Youngblood-Glass has since claimed she actually said "ants in my panties", which she apparently is too ignorant of politics to realize is not the way to speak if she wants to be taken seriously as a candidate for Governor.

Jeff

10 hours ago · Like

Kevin Pick Thank you for responding to my concerns. 

All specifics aside, I think any article that discusses a quote from someone ought to have that quote somewhere in the article. Therefore, this article would be greatly improved by starting it off with "On XX day, XXX person stated XXX to XXX."...See More

9 hours ago · Like

Jeff Daiell The interview was right after her nomination in 2010. 

Jeff

9 hours ago · Like

Open Borders: Mises Institute v. Kathie Glass

It is my purpose to promote a coherent presentation of libertarianism via the library.  As such, I am forced to take a position opposed to that of Kathie Glass, a candidate running for Texas Governor under the Libertarian Party brand.  Dangers are everywhere for a political party that separates from its central goals and philosophy, as we saw in early 20th Century Germany, for example.  We must hold true to who we are, or we will be nothing separate from the others.

I turn your attention to page 195 of "Labor Economics From A Free Market Perspective:  Employing the Unemployable," by Walter Block, a publication I purchased days ago for $29 from the Mises Book Store.  "[M]erely by appearing at our shores, particularly at the invitation of a citizen and property owner, cannot be said by that fact alone to have initiated violence against an innocent person."

Block goes into anarco-capitialsm, as the lengthy book portion goes on into more detail, so there is no pro-border position for Glass to assume.

No disrespect to Kathie Glass, but her opposition to foreigners getting access to the 10th plank of "The Communist Manifesto," (government indoctrination day camps for children/ so-called, "free public schools") represents a redirect away from libertarianism more associated with the national socialism of the Republican Party.  The problem is that government is involved in the educational process at all, per Murray N. Rothbard's "For a New Liberty:  The Libertarian Manifesto."  Libertarians oppose the 10th plank altogether, and then border securement logically has no relationship to education.

Borders are not walls that keep the freedom in;  rather, they are walls that keep the freedom moot.  And the racism intrinsic to the Glass position is not libertarianism in any context.

Gene Chapman, CEO
Libertarian Global Library and Book Exchange
gkchapman2012@hotmail.com

The Dynamics of Slavery and Kathie Glass

1)  Taxation of the labor of un-condemned free persons.

2)  Taxation of the intrinsic value of property of un-condemned free persons (property being the physical manifestation of labor).

3)  Numbering un-condemned free persons as cattle.  (Kathie Glass supports E-verify and the possible loss of a business license if E-verify is not used for employment checks.  People have to be numbered for E-verify to work.  Also is indicative of the mark of the beast concept in the Christian religion:  Revelation 13:16.)

4)  Observation and control of the physical location of un-condemned free persons.

5)  Observation and Control of the activities and interrelationships of un-condemned free persons.

6)  Control of weapon possession of un-condemned free persons.

7)  Control of education and information flow of un-condemned free persons.  (Kathie Glass openly supports the 10th plank of "The Communist Manifesto" on her campaign website:  Government indoctrination day camps for children.)

8)  Control of the monetary system/ activities of un-condemnd free persons.

ChapmanShredsKathieGlass.blogspot.com

Kathie Glass -- Wrong for liberty, right for slavery.

The Forces of Light vs. The Forces of Darkness

When I bagan to challenge Mrs. Kathie Glass' supportive position on the 10th plank of "The Communist Manifesto" several months ago, many thought I was a clown, as the Libertarian Party is not known as a serious contender, so it must be that I was just a humorous prank at her cost.  But what is at stake between the Glass duo and myself is the soul of libertarianism, whether freedom will be the freedom of Fidel Castro or the freedom of Greek definition -- elutheria:  without liability of obligation. 

This is not funny, for what Ron Paul spent his life defending is a fundamental opposition to ALL of Marxism, all of the planks.  My conflict with the Glass duo is a battle between light and darkness, between good and evil, between the violent coercion of the political classes and the non-violence of the people who just want to breath free once again.

If you support a candiate who supports a single plank of Marxist darkness, you help to drive a nail in the hopes of Ron Paul's dream for a brighter day.  Let us join in prayer that this evil empire that invades even the Libertarian Party will, by God's grace, fall away from our shores.

Gene Chapman, CEO
Libertarian Global Library and Book Exchange

You Can't unscramble Eggs (with Supporting Evidence)

The reason my state-centric opponents for Texas Governor are wrong-headed is because you can't unscramble eggs, meaning that our constitutional government was long ago twisted away from the will of the common interpretation to lawyer-speak. For example, at university a couple of years ago, my Political Science professor took us to the "necessary and proper" clause in Article 1. Section 8 of the U. S. Constitution. The courts have again and again ruled that the twists and turns Congress has placed on this article are legal under the U. S. Constitution. We have a host of government redirects from this one clause, from personal income taxes to public schools to Obamacare and into infinity, that will never get redefined to our liking.  It's like swimming up Niagara Falls to think these interpretations can be changed by the system that created the problem.

The solution is to dissolve government at all levels, non-violently, by running candidates for office who will refuse the oath of office when elected. At critical mass, the state ceases to exist.

If you want another government, you're free to start it up. As for me, I'm fine with no government.

Time Is Short:

Recently, I was watching a Bill Moyers (I'm not a fan) television broadcast on PBS, concerning gun control.  To my surprise, the population of Americans who own guns has dropped in recent years from 35% of the population to 25%, according to Moyers.  This means that the effort to remove guns from our society is real and has been effective, so the number of trigger fingers in a potential revolution has gone from 105 million to 75 million in recent years.  And there is no end in sight.  They are successful in driving out guns in our society.

Additionally, having been involved with three armed standoffs between individuals and the government in my lifetime, I know too well that no one is coming to your aid at 2 a. m., if the feds decide your guns are too dangerous to national security.

So, as there is no national move for a citizen's mutual defense pact, and you are on your own on the gun issue, what do you do?

Your vote on a computer is suspicious at best and illegitimate at worst.  Your candidates think they can unscramble eggs, but all ten planks of "The Communist Manifesto" are codified into law by the rich and powerful.  Your gun possession is short lived under the current system.  The next move is to abolish the government through non-violent means:  run candidates for office who will refuse the oath of office when elected.  At critical mass, the government ceases to exist.  (And within this context, keep in mind that Gene Chapman is the only candidate for Texas Governor for any political party who has refused to swear or affirm allegiance to the 10 planks of "The Communist Manifesto.")

You Have An Ally With a Proven Solution: 

It just so happens that the lawyer M. K. Gandhi picked up a book a hundred years ago called, "The Kingdom Of God Is Within You," by Leo Tolstoy.  This book transformed everything for Gandhi.  It is the reason he is now called Mahatma (Great Soul) Gandhi, the Father of India.  This book is behind Nelson Mandela being the Father of South Africa and Martin Luther King, Jr. having that world famous dream, not that I would agree with any of these three men in total.

It turns out, according to Tolstoy, that Jesus Christ was in favor of transforming society from a state-centric society into a Kingdom-centric society.  And the tactics Tolstoy gives from Christ's "Sermon on the Mount" WORK.  You weaken or abolish the state by non-perticipation with it's "oath" system:  "swear not."  Then the people take control of the reigns from the rich and powerful. 

My opponents for Texas Governor will tell you that they will dismantle the grip of the laws presented below if they ever get elected into office.  In just one example, the central bank (5th plank of "The Communist Manifesto") turned 100 years old recently and Obamacare (an expansion of the 2nd plank of "The Communist Manifesto") just got passed into law.  Look in the mirror and ask yourself the question:  Who is winning the court route to freeing America?

Gene Chapman
ChapmanForTexasGovernor2014.com
[Endorsed by Dr. Noam Chomsky (Intellectual of the Age) and Dr. Ravindra Kumar (World's Most Prominent Gandhian Intellectual)]
(Treasurer:  Fred Smart)
gkchapman2012@hotmail.com


The 10 PLANKS stated in the Communist Manifesto and some of their American counterparts are...
1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes. 
Americans do these with actions such as the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868), and various zoning, school & property taxes. Also the Bureau of Land Management (Zoning laws are the first step to government property ownership)
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax. 
Americans know this as misapplication of the 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913, The Social Security Act of 1936.; Joint House Resolution 192 of 1933; and various State "income" taxes. We call it "paying your fair share".
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance. 
Americans call it Federal & State estate Tax (1916); or reformed Probate Laws, and limited inheritance via arbitrary inheritance tax statutes.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels. 
Americans call it government seizures, tax liens, Public "law" 99-570 (1986); Executive order 11490, sections 1205, 2002 which gives private land to the Department of Urban Development; the imprisonment of "terrorists" and those who speak out or write against the "government" (1997 Crime/Terrorist Bill); or the IRS confiscation of property without due process. Asset forfeiture laws are used by DEA, IRS, ATF etc...).
5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
Americans call it the Federal Reserve which is a privately-owned credit/debt system allowed by the Federal Reserve act of 1913. All local banks are members of the Fed system, and are regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) another privately-owned corporation. The Federal Reserve Banks issue Fiat Paper Money and practice economically destructive fractional reserve banking.
6. Centralization of the means of communications and transportation in the hands of the State. 
Americans call it the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Department of Transportation (DOT) mandated through the ICC act of 1887, the Commissions Act of 1934, The Interstate Commerce Commission established in 1938, The Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Communications Commission, and Executive orders 11490, 10999, as well as State mandated driver's licenses and Department of Transportation regulations.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state, the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
Americans call it corporate capacity, The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture… Thus read "controlled or subsidized" rather than "owned"… This is easily seen in these as well as the Department of Commerce and Labor, Department of Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, National Park Service, and the IRS control of business through corporate regulations.
8. Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
Americans call it Minimum Wage and slave labor like dealing with our Most Favored Nation trade partner; i.e. Communist China. We see it in practice via the Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor. The National debt and inflation caused by the communal bank has caused the need for a two "income" family. Woman in the workplace since the 1920's, the 19th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted Socialist Unions, affirmative action, the Federal Public Works Program and of course Executive order 11000.
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries, gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equitable distribution of population over the country.
Americans call it the Planning Reorganization act of 1949 , zoning (Title 17 1910-1990) and Super Corporate Farms, as well as Executive orders 11647, 11731 (ten regions) and Public "law" 89-136. These provide for forced relocations and forced sterilization programs, like in China.
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production. 
Americans are being taxed to support what we call 'public' schools, but are actually "government force-tax-funded schools " Even private schools are government regulated. The purpose is to train the young to work for the communal debt system. We also call it the Department of Education, the NEA and Outcome Based "Education" . These are used so that all children can be indoctrinated and inculcated with the government propaganda, like "majority rules", and "pay your fair share". WHERE are the words "fair share" in the Constitution, Bill of Rights or the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26)??